Quality: general · Hordeum vulgare (barley)

27 questions: every treatment tested on this organism for this target by at least two papers.

  1. Gibberellic acidPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  2. (+)-abscisic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  3. Vicia fabaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  4. chitosanResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  5. zinc atomResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  6. fertilizationPositive and negative results15 papers: 9 positive, 6 negative or no effect
  7. inoculationPositive and negative results8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  8. nitrogenPositive and negative results8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  9. irrigationPositive and negative results7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  10. applicationPositive and negative results6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect
  11. fungicidePositive and negative results5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  12. processingPositive and negative results5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  13. storagePositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  14. insecticidePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  15. organicPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  16. otherResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  17. rotationResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  18. tillageResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  19. classResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  20. densityResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  21. droughtResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  22. herbicideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  23. potassiumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  24. radiationResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  25. salinityResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  26. sowing timeResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  27. windResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.