- (+)-abscisic acidPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- salicylic acidPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- chromium atomResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- sodium chlorideResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- tillagePositive and negative results26 papers: 19 positive, 7 negative or no effect
- fertilizationPositive and negative results11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- nitrogenPositive and negative results6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- radiationPositive and negative results4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect
- inoculationPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- transplantingPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- limePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- storagePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- salinityResults agree7 papers: 0 positive, 7 negative or no effect
- droughtResults agree4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect
- organicResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- cover cropResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- intercroppingResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- otherResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.