Weed · Hordeum vulgare (barley)

1. isoproturonPositive and negative results7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect
2. (4-chloro-2-methylphenoxy)acetic acidPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
3. Sinapis albaPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
4. cyanazinePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
5. metsulfuron methylResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. fluroxypyrResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. glyphosateResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. 2,4-DResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. MethabenzthiazuronResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
10. Trifolium repensResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. chlorotoluronResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. clodinafop-propargylResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. esterResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. halauxifen-methylResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. methylResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
16. metribuzinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
17. herbicidePositive and negative results34 papers: 26 positive, 8 negative or no effect
18. tillagePositive and negative results24 papers: 17 positive, 7 negative or no effect
19. fertilizationPositive and negative results14 papers: 9 positive, 5 negative or no effect
20. intercroppingPositive and negative results10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect
21. nitrogenPositive and negative results9 papers: 4 positive, 5 negative or no effect
22. densityPositive and negative results7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect
23. cover cropPositive and negative results5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect
24. rotationPositive and negative results5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect
25. transplantingPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
26. botanicalResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
27. applicationResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
28. cultivation systemResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
29. inoculationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
30. mulchingResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
31. organicResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
32. processingResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.