Yield · Lolium

41 questions: every treatment tested on this organism for this target by at least two papers.

  1. Trifolium repensPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  2. ammonium sulfatePositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  3. manganese atomPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  4. zinc atomPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  5. DalaponPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  6. Hordeum vulgarePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  7. copper atomPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  8. ethofumesatePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  9. glyphosatePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  10. magnesium atomPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  11. paraquatPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  12. sulfur atomResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  13. Zea mays subsp. maysResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  14. magnesium sulfateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  15. sodium nitroprussideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  16. phosphorusResults differ18 papers: 14 positive, 4 negative or no effect · 2 pairs of papers confirmed to differ
  17. nitrogenPositive and negative results54 papers: 42 positive, 12 negative or no effect
  18. fertilizationPositive and negative results50 papers: 38 positive, 12 negative or no effect
  19. grazingPositive and negative results15 papers: 8 positive, 7 negative or no effect
  20. pruningPositive and negative results15 papers: 8 positive, 7 negative or no effect
  21. potassiumPositive and negative results11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  22. limePositive and negative results8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  23. inoculationPositive and negative results6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect
  24. processingPositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  25. applicationPositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  26. transplantingPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  27. densityPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  28. herbicidePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  29. in vitroPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  30. sowing timePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  31. tillagePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  32. uvPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  33. rotationResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  34. salinityResults agree4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect
  35. infectionResults agree3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect
  36. insecticideResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  37. irrigationResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  38. droughtResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  39. fungicideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  40. intercroppingResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  41. otherResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.