Nutrient: content · Lolium perenne (perennial ryegrass)

26 questions: every treatment tested on this organism for this target by at least two papers.

  1. copper atomPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  2. sulfatePositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  3. carbohydratePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  4. paraquatPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  5. glucoseResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  6. ethylenediaminetetraacetic acidResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  7. sucroseResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  8. nitrilotriacetic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  9. selenateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  10. sodium nitroprussideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  11. fertilizationPositive and negative results17 papers: 12 positive, 5 negative or no effect
  12. otherPositive and negative results8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  13. pruningPositive and negative results7 papers: 2 positive, 5 negative or no effect
  14. co2Positive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  15. irrigationPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  16. applicationPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  17. droughtPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  18. heavy metalPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  19. limePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  20. salinityPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  21. inoculationResults agree11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  22. mycorrhizaResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  23. nitrogenResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  24. phResults agree3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect
  25. lightResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  26. pollutionResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.