- imidaclopridPositive and negative results14 papers: 12 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- pymetrozinePositive and negative results14 papers: 12 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- fipronilPositive and negative results9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- deltamethrinPositive and negative results8 papers: 2 positive, 6 negative or no effect
- dinotefuranPositive and negative results7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- acephatePositive and negative results6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- carbofuranPositive and negative results6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- diazinonPositive and negative results5 papers: 1 positive, 4 negative or no effect
- thiamethoxamPositive and negative results5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- acetamipridPositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- cartapPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- azadirachtinPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- lambda-cyhalothrinPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- parathion-methylPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- isoprocarbPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- triazophosPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- buprofezinResults agree8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- silicon atomResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Azadirachta indicaResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- flonicamidResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- sulfoxaflorResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- MatrineResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- fenvalerateResults agree3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect
- nitenpyramResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- (+)-abscisic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- 2,4-DResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Cucumis melo var. inodorusResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Metarhizium anisopliaeResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Syzygium aromaticumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- abamectinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- calcium silicateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- chlorpyrifosResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- clothianidinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- cypermethrinResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- etofenproxResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- fenobucarbResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- linaloolResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- phytogenic insecticideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- schaftosideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- silicate(4-)Results agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- tricyclazoleResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- botanicalPositive and negative results23 papers: 22 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- infectionPositive and negative results18 papers: 9 positive, 9 negative or no effect
- applicationPositive and negative results12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- fertilizationPositive and negative results12 papers: 5 positive, 7 negative or no effect
- insecticidePositive and negative results12 papers: 7 positive, 5 negative or no effect
- nitrogenPositive and negative results12 papers: 4 positive, 8 negative or no effect
- biocontrolPositive and negative results6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- loss of functionPositive and negative results6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- co2Positive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.