application · Ustilaginoidea virens · Oryza sativa (rice)
24 claims from these papers; 1 citation between them.
Papers here report positive and negative or no-effect results. No pair of them has been accepted in the claim-by-claim check.
How these papers cite each other
1 citation between these papers: 1 on the same side, 0 across the two sides.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a positive result 10
- positive
Study on Controlling Ustilaginoidea virens with Several Fungicides · 2008
- positive
The Effect of Preventing and Curing Rice Blast and False Smut by Using the New Fungicide SYP-7017 · 2010
- positive
Infection characteristics of Ustilaginoidea virens and optimal time for disease control · 2013
- positive
Evaluation of selected fungicides against false smut disease of rice caused by Ustilaginoidea virens · 2018
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Evaluation of different modules for the management of false smut of rice under field conditions · 2020
- positive
Biological Control of Ustilaginoidea virens Using Chelerythrine Suspension · 2024
- positive
Evaluation of fungicides to manage rice false smut (Ustilaginoidea virens) in the hills of Nepal · 2024
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 3
- no effect
Biology and artificial inoculation of Ustilaginoidea virens (Cooke) Takahashi in rice · 2015
- negative
- negative
- negative
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.