Ustilaginoidea virens · Oryza sativa (rice)

1. carbendazimPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
2. copper atomPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
3. triadimefonPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
4. propiconazoleResults agree8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. tebuconazoleResults agree8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. azoxystrobinResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. trifloxystrobinResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. Bacillus subtilisResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. TrichodermaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. pyraclostrobinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. silver nanoparticleResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. applicationPositive and negative results13 papers: 10 positive, 3 negative or no effect
13. fungicidePositive and negative results9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect
14. transgenicPositive and negative results4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect
15. inoculationPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
16. nitrogenPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
17. stagePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
18. loss of functionResults agree8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect
19. seed treatmentResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
20. biocontrolResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
21. pathogen productResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
22. processingResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
23. sowing timeResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.