Lissorhoptrus oryzophilus · Oryza sativa (rice)

1. lambda-cyhalothrinPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
2. chlorantraniliproleResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
3. carbofuranResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. thiamethoxamResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. (-)-methyl jasmonateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. aldrinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. clothianidinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. diflubenzuronResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. glufosinateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. insecticidePositive and negative results8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect
11. floodingPositive and negative results7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect
12. inoculationPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
13. fertilizationPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
14. seed treatmentResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. densityResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
16. herbicideResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
17. mycorrhizaResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
18. sowing timeResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.