Xanthomonas oryzae · Oryza sativa (rice)

1. nickel atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
2. loss of functionPositive and negative results9 papers: 3 positive, 6 negative or no effect
3. applicationPositive and negative results6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect
4. nanoparticlePositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
5. inoculationPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
6. pathogen productPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
7. in vitroPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
8. botanicalResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. infectionResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
10. nitrogenResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. transgenicResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.