Cnaphalocrocis medinalis · Oryza sativa (rice)

32 questions: every treatment tested on this organism for this target by at least two papers.

  1. fipronilPositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  2. emamectin benzoatePositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  3. buprofezinPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  4. flubendiamideResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  5. chlorantraniliproleResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  6. chlorpyrifosResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  7. Azadirachta indicaResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  8. azadirachtinResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  9. lambda-cyhalothrinResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  10. profenofosResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  11. Beauveria bassianaResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  12. flufenoxuronResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  13. hydrochlorideResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  14. indoxacarbResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  15. monocrotophosResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  16. Bacillus thuringiensisResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  17. MetaflumizoneResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  18. Metarhizium anisopliaeResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  19. acephateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  20. cartapResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  21. limonoidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  22. silicon atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  23. applicationPositive and negative results7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  24. transgenicPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  25. botanicalResults agree15 papers: 15 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  26. insecticideResults agree8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  27. otherResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  28. fertilizationResults agree3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect
  29. infectionResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  30. loss of functionResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  31. nitrogenResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  32. transplantingResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.