- thifluzamidePositive and negative results7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- Trichoderma viridePositive and negative results5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- kresoxim-methylPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- tricyclazolePositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- propiconazoleResults agree11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- tebuconazoleResults agree11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- TrichodermaResults agree10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Pseudomonas fluorescensResults agree9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- hexaconazoleResults agree9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- azoxystrobinResults agree8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- carbendazimResults agree8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Bacillus subtilisResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- silicon atomResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- chitosanResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- difenoconazoleResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Trichoderma harzianumResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- salicylic acidResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- validamycin AResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Allium sativumResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- antimicrobial agentResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- mancozebResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- pencycuronResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- silver nanoparticleResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- trifloxystrobinResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Aloe veraResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Azadirachta indicaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Bacillus amyloliquefaciensResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Bacillus pumilusResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Chromolaena odorataResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Curcuma longaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- PseudomonasResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Stenotrophomonas maltophiliaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- StreptomycesResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Syzygium aromaticumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Trichoderma asperellumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- acibenzolar-S-methylResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- flusilazoleResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- glyphosateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- metaboliteResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- sodium silicateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- applicationPositive and negative results37 papers: 36 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- inoculationPositive and negative results31 papers: 23 positive, 8 negative or no effect
- botanicalPositive and negative results21 papers: 19 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- pathogen productPositive and negative results11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect
- transplantingPositive and negative results8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- biocontrolPositive and negative results6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- infectionPositive and negative results4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect
- organicPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- otherPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- tillagePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.