Sitophilus oryzae · Oryza sativa (rice)

1. Syzygium aromaticumPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
2. silicon dioxidePositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
3. TalcPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
4. Azadirachta indicaResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. diatomaceous earthResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. Curcuma longaResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. camphorResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. Acorus calamusResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. Cinnamomum verumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. Metarhizium anisopliaeResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. kaolinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. malathionResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. botanicalPositive and negative results29 papers: 28 positive, 1 negative or no effect
14. storagePositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
15. nanoparticleResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
16. insecticideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
17. processingResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
18. radiationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.