Scirpophaga incertulas · Oryza sativa (rice)

1. carbofuranPositive and negative results7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect
2. Azadirachta indicaPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
3. Bacillus thuringiensisPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
4. fipronilResults agree9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. chlorantraniliproleResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. azadirachtinResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. cartapResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. flubendiamideResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. hydrochlorideResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. imidaclopridResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. spinosadResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. Beauveria bassianaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. chlorpyrifosResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. emamectin benzoateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. botanicalPositive and negative results9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect
16. fertilizationPositive and negative results5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect
17. applicationPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
18. insecticideResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
19. transplantingResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.