- bispyribac-sodiumPositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- Triticum aestivumPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- dichloromethanePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- pendimethalinResults agree8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- propanilResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- butachlorResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- 2,4-DResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- ThiobencarbResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- bispyribacResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- AnilofosResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Cyhalofop-butylResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- PenoxsulamResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- clomazoneResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- methanolResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- metsulfuron methylResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- quincloracResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- herbicidePositive and negative results10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- tillagePositive and negative results6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect
- botanicalResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- fertilizationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- organicResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.