Quality: postharvest · Oryza sativa (rice)

1. (+)-abscisic acidPositive and negative results6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect
2. Azadirachta indicaPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
3. Gibberellic acidPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
4. N-benzyladenineResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. sodium chlorideResults agree4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect
6. silicon atomResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. Nicotiana tabacumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. aluminium atomResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
9. benzimidazoleResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. magnesium atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. mannitolResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. spinosadResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. fertilizationPositive and negative results22 papers: 20 positive, 2 negative or no effect
14. nitrogenPositive and negative results22 papers: 17 positive, 5 negative or no effect
15. processingPositive and negative results18 papers: 12 positive, 6 negative or no effect
16. loss of functionPositive and negative results13 papers: 6 positive, 7 negative or no effect
17. irrigationPositive and negative results12 papers: 6 positive, 6 negative or no effect
18. applicationPositive and negative results11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect
19. storagePositive and negative results10 papers: 5 positive, 5 negative or no effect
20. botanicalPositive and negative results9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect
21. droughtPositive and negative results9 papers: 3 positive, 6 negative or no effect
22. transplantingPositive and negative results8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect
23. co2Positive and negative results7 papers: 3 positive, 4 negative or no effect
24. heatPositive and negative results7 papers: 2 positive, 5 negative or no effect
25. coldPositive and negative results6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect
26. salinityPositive and negative results5 papers: 1 positive, 4 negative or no effect
27. tillagePositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
28. floodingPositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
29. phosphorusPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
30. radiationPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
31. stagePositive and negative results4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect
32. shadePositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
33. soil waterPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
34. sowing timePositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
35. climate sitePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
36. lightResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
37. potassiumResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
38. classResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
39. inoculationResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
40. seed treatmentResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
41. biocharResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
42. densityResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
43. nanoparticleResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
44. overexpressionResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.