Physiology: water · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)

1. pendimethalinPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
2. Vigna aconitifoliaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
3. Vigna radiata var. radiataResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. fertilizationResults differ12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect · 1 pair of papers confirmed to differ
5. droughtPositive and negative results10 papers: 2 positive, 8 negative or no effect
6. tillagePositive and negative results9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect
7. irrigationPositive and negative results8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect
8. nitrogenPositive and negative results7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect
9. inoculationResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. organicResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. mulchingResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. herbicideResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. intercroppingResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. phosphorusResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. applicationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
16. salinityResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.