Control · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)

1. Gibberellic acidPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
2. acetochlorPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
3. imazapyrPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
4. TebuthiuronResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. atrazineResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. DiclosulamResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. chlorantraniliproleResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. diuronResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. indaziflamResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. pendimethalinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. phorateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. phoximResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. terbufosResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. thiamethoxamResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. applicationPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
16. fertilizationResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
17. herbicideResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.