- diuronPositive and negative results4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect
- Halosulfuron-methylPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- imazapicPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- sulfentrazonePositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- 2,4-DPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- HexazinonePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- atrazinePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- mesotrionePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- ametrynResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- asulamResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- clomazoneResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- imazapyrResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- metribuzinResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- herbicidePositive and negative results10 papers: 3 positive, 7 negative or no effect
- applicationPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.