- (+)-abscisic acidPositive and negative results9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- salicylic acidPositive and negative results6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- sucrosePositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- Sporisorium scitamineumPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- manganese atomPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- (-)-methyl jasmonateResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- poly(ethylene glycol)Results agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- (2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Xanthomonas albilineansResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- copper(II) chlorideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- hydrogen peroxideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- droughtPositive and negative results11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- inoculationPositive and negative results5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- fertilizationPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- coldResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- infectionResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- nitrogenResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- salinityResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.