Nutrient: content · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)

45 questions: every treatment tested on this organism for this target by at least two papers.

  1. silicon atomPositive and negative results19 papers: 17 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  2. calcium atomPositive and negative results6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  3. silicate(4-)Positive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  4. calcium silicatePositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  5. glyphosatePositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  6. potassium chloridePositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  7. Nitrospirillum amazonensePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  8. gypsumPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  9. zinc atomResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  10. Pseudomonas fluorescensResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  11. manganese atomResults agree4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect
  12. Azospirillum brasilenseResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  13. Bacillus subtilisResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  14. aluminium atomResults agree3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect
  15. GluconacetobacterResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  16. diatomaceous earthResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  17. sodium chlorideResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  18. sulfur atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  19. phosphorusResults differ15 papers: 14 positive, 1 negative or no effect · 1 pair of papers confirmed to differ
  20. fertilizationPositive and negative results78 papers: 71 positive, 7 negative or no effect
  21. nitrogenPositive and negative results31 papers: 23 positive, 8 negative or no effect
  22. inoculationPositive and negative results22 papers: 20 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  23. irrigationPositive and negative results11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect
  24. organicPositive and negative results10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  25. applicationPositive and negative results9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  26. limePositive and negative results9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  27. intercroppingPositive and negative results8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  28. tillagePositive and negative results7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  29. salinityPositive and negative results6 papers: 1 positive, 5 negative or no effect
  30. mulchingPositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  31. otherPositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  32. droughtPositive and negative results4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect
  33. transplantingPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  34. biocharPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  35. densityPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  36. in vitroPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  37. rotationPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  38. infectionPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  39. potassiumResults agree10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  40. mycorrhizaResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  41. botanicalResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  42. heavy metalResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  43. herbicideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  44. processingResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  45. stageResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.