Nutrient: efficiency · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)

1. AzospirillumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
2. nitrogenPositive and negative results11 papers: 6 positive, 5 negative or no effect
3. fertilizationPositive and negative results10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect
4. irrigationResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. potassiumResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. biocharResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. inoculationResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. applicationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. droughtResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
10. otherResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.