- Colletotrichum falcatumResults differ2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect · 1 pair of papers confirmed to differ
- imidaclopridPositive and negative results6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- 2,4-DPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- endosulfanPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- glyphosatePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- (2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acidResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- N-benzyladenineResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- fipronilResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- silicon atomResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- chlorantraniliproleResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Trichogramma chilonisResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- malathionResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- sucroseResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- carbofuranResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- chlorpyrifosResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- 1-naphthaleneacetic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- AzotobacterResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Gibberellic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- GluconacetobacterResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- MetarhiziumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Purpureocillium lilacinumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- cartapResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- hydrochlorideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- paclobutrazolResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- paraquatResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- sodium chlorideResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- fertilizationPositive and negative results31 papers: 26 positive, 5 negative or no effect
- applicationPositive and negative results18 papers: 16 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- insecticidePositive and negative results16 papers: 12 positive, 4 negative or no effect
- in vitroPositive and negative results10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- inoculationPositive and negative results10 papers: 7 positive, 3 negative or no effect
- nitrogenPositive and negative results6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- densityPositive and negative results5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- irrigationPositive and negative results5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect
- herbicidePositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- phPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- coldPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- infectionPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- organicPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- seed treatmentPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- tillagePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- potassiumResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- biocontrolResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- botanicalResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- droughtResults agree3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect
- mulchingResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- pruningResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- biocharResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- classResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- intercroppingResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.