Physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)

1. (2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acidResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
2. chitosanResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
3. (+)-abscisic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. Colletotrichum falcatumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. silicon atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. droughtResults differ9 papers: 5 positive, 4 negative or no effect · 2 pairs of papers confirmed to differ
7. infectionPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
8. mycorrhizaPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
9. nanoparticlePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
10. applicationResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. inoculationResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. resistance inducerResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. irrigationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. otherResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. stageResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
16. storageResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.