Quality: general · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)

29 questions: every treatment tested on this organism for this target by at least two papers.

  1. zinc atomPositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  2. potassium chloridePositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  3. (2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acidResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  4. Allium cepaResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  5. calcium oxideResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  6. fertilizationPositive and negative results36 papers: 20 positive, 16 negative or no effect
  7. nitrogenPositive and negative results21 papers: 11 positive, 10 negative or no effect
  8. irrigationPositive and negative results12 papers: 6 positive, 6 negative or no effect
  9. phosphorusPositive and negative results11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect
  10. densityPositive and negative results7 papers: 2 positive, 5 negative or no effect
  11. herbicidePositive and negative results7 papers: 3 positive, 4 negative or no effect
  12. applicationPositive and negative results6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  13. potassiumPositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  14. micronutrientPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  15. transplantingPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  16. botanicalPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  17. floodingPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  18. mulchingPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  19. nanoparticlePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  20. sowing timePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  21. tillagePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  22. intercroppingResults agree8 papers: 0 positive, 8 negative or no effect
  23. droughtResults agree4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect
  24. storageResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  25. inoculationResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  26. classResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  27. infectionResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  28. otherResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  29. rotationResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.