Earias vittella · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)

1. monocrotophosPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
2. emamectin benzoateResults agree21 papers: 21 positive, 0 negative or no effect
3. spinosadResults agree20 papers: 20 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. chlorantraniliproleResults agree15 papers: 15 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. cypermethrinResults agree15 papers: 15 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. imidaclopridResults agree12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. flubendiamideResults agree10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. indoxacarbResults agree10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. fipronilResults agree8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. endosulfanResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. azadirachtinResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. chlorpyrifosResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. Trichogramma chilonisResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. thiamethoxamResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. Beauveria bassianaResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
16. Allium sativumResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
17. Azadirachta indicaResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
18. Bacillus thuringiensisResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
19. Metarhizium anisopliaeResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
20. SpinetoramResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
21. deltamethrinResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
22. Bacillus thuringiensis serovar kurstakiResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
23. Chromolaena odorataResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
24. abamectinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
25. bifenthrinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
26. carbosulfanResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
27. lambda-cyhalothrinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
28. profenofosResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
29. botanicalPositive and negative results17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect
30. lightPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
31. insecticideResults agree12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect
32. applicationResults agree9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect
33. transgenicResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
34. seed treatmentResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
35. trap barrierResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.