Control · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)

1. chlorantraniliprolePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
2. hexaconazoleResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
3. cypermethrinResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. Azadirachta indicaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. Oryza sativaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. hydrogen peroxideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. sulfur atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. thiamethoxamResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. triazophosResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. botanicalPositive and negative results8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect
11. seed treatmentPositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
12. insecticidePositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
13. droughtResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. applicationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. biocontrolResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.