Nutrient: content · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)

1. Gibberellic acidResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
2. indole-3-acetic acidResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
3. zinc atomResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. iron(2+) sulfate (anhydrous)Results agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. prolineResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. zinc sulfateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. fertilizationPositive and negative results67 papers: 62 positive, 5 negative or no effect
8. inoculationPositive and negative results9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect
9. biocharPositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
10. organicPositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
11. salinityPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
12. infectionPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
13. potassiumPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
14. nitrogenResults agree17 papers: 17 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. otherResults agree9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect
16. applicationResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
17. botanicalResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
18. phosphorusResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
19. mulchingResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
20. mycorrhizaResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
21. nanoparticleResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
22. droughtResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
23. limeResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.