Weed · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)

1. pendimethalinResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
2. poly(ethylene)Results agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
3. butachlorResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. FluchloralinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. Oryza sativaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. metolachlorResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. prometrynResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. silver atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. fertilizationPositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
10. intercroppingPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
11. densityPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
12. herbicideResults agree18 papers: 18 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. mulchingResults agree14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. organicResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. processingResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.