Striga · Sorghum

1. Vigna unguiculataResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
2. FusariumResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
3. 2,4-DResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. trichlopyrResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. Sesamum indicumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. StreptomycesResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. chlorsulfuronResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. macronutrientResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. inoculationPositive and negative results9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect
10. intercroppingPositive and negative results7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect
11. herbicidePositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
12. transplantingPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
13. fertilizationResults agree8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. nitrogenResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. mulchingResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
16. mycorrhizaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
17. tillageResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.