- atrazinePositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- carbofuranPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- metolachlorPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- trifluralinPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- glyphosateResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Naphthalic anhydrideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- ammonium sulfateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- diazinonResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- dicambaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- naledResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- nicosulfuronResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- parathionResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- phosphamidonResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- quizalofopResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- seed treatmentPositive and negative results6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- applicationPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- herbicideResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- botanicalResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- fertilizationResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.