stage · Growth · Sorghum

Positive and negative results9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect

12 claims from these papers.

Papers here report positive and negative or no-effect results. No pair of them has been accepted in the claim-by-claim check.

How these papers cite each other

None of these papers cites another one here.

Positive resultNegative result or no effect1990199520002005201020152020
  • Positive result
  • Negative result or no effect
  • Citation, pointing to the cited paper
  • Citation across the two sides
  • Larger circle: more citations overall

Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.

Papers reporting a positive result 6

  1. The influence of seed maturity at harvest and drying method on the embryo, α-amylase activity and seed vigour in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) · 1996

  2. The Effect of cutting and distance between hills in some growth characters and forage yield for sorghum. · 2014

  3. Effect of soil and foliar application of zinc on sorghum (sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) yield, agronomic efficiency and apparent recovery efficiency · 2017

  4. TRINEXAPAC-ETHYL REDUCES PLANT HEIGHT AND SEED YIELD IN FORAGE SORGHUM · 2021

  5. STUDIES ON BORON NUTRITION IN RABI SORGHUM TO ANALYSE ITS MORPHOLOGICAL ATTRIBUTES · 2024

  6. Studies on boron nutrition in Rabi sorghum to analyse its morphological attributes · 2024

Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 3

  1. Physiological responses of sorghum genotypes to environmental stress · 1987

  2. Radiation‐Use Efficiency among Grain Sorghum Cultivars and Plant Densities · 1993

  3. Effects of drought stress on biomass and carbohydrate contents of two sweet sorghum cultivars. · 2013

A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.

stage on Sorghum against other targets

stage · growth on other organisms