Physiology: water · Sorghum

34 questions: every treatment tested on this organism for this target by at least two papers.

  1. sodium chloridePositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  2. salicylic acidResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  3. silicon atomResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  4. atrazineResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  5. (+)-abscisic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  6. Triticum aestivumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  7. chlormequat chlorideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  8. silicate(4-)Results agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  9. zinc atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  10. droughtResults differ25 papers: 9 positive, 16 negative or no effect · 2 pairs of papers confirmed to differ
  11. irrigationPositive and negative results27 papers: 22 positive, 5 negative or no effect
  12. nitrogenPositive and negative results13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  13. salinityPositive and negative results9 papers: 5 positive, 4 negative or no effect
  14. tillagePositive and negative results9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect
  15. intercroppingPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  16. soil waterPositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  17. mulchingResults agree9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  18. fertilizationResults agree8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  19. seed treatmentResults agree8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  20. organicResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  21. potassiumResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  22. co2Results agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  23. inoculationResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  24. processingResults agree3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect
  25. pruningResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  26. climate siteResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  27. cultivation systemResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  28. limeResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  29. mycorrhizaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  30. otherResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  31. rainfallResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  32. sowing timeResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  33. transgenicResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  34. transplantingResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.