Quality: protein · Sorghum

1. zinc atomResults agree8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect
2. Vigna unguiculataResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
3. AzospirillumResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. AzotobacterResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. Triticum aestivumResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. iron atomResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. sodium carbonateResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
8. zinc sulfateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. nitrogenResults differ47 papers: 43 positive, 4 negative or no effect · 1 pair of papers confirmed to differ
10. droughtResults differ7 papers: 2 positive, 5 negative or no effect · 2 pairs of papers confirmed to differ
11. fertilizationPositive and negative results53 papers: 47 positive, 6 negative or no effect
12. intercroppingPositive and negative results14 papers: 11 positive, 3 negative or no effect
13. inoculationPositive and negative results13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect
14. processingPositive and negative results11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect
15. irrigationPositive and negative results9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect
16. densityPositive and negative results7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect
17. potassiumPositive and negative results6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect
18. salinityPositive and negative results5 papers: 1 positive, 4 negative or no effect
19. sowing timePositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
20. nanoparticlePositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
21. tillagePositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
22. otherPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
23. stagePositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
24. alkalinityPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
25. biocharPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
26. infectionPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
27. applicationResults agree12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect
28. phosphorusResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
29. pruningResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
30. mycorrhizaResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
31. rotationResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
32. botanicalResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
33. herbicideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
34. mulchingResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.