Nutrient: content · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)

1. zinc atomPositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
2. iron atomPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
3. iron(2+) sulfate (anhydrous)Positive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
4. zinc sulfatePositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
5. copper atomPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
6. salicylic acidPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
7. SorghumResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. Trifolium pratenseResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. aluminium atomResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
10. ammonium polyphosphateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. ethylenediaminetetraacetic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. nitrogenPositive and negative results23 papers: 19 positive, 4 negative or no effect
13. fertilizationPositive and negative results21 papers: 20 positive, 1 negative or no effect
14. tillagePositive and negative results8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect
15. phosphorusPositive and negative results6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect
16. applicationPositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
17. nanoparticlePositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
18. processingPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
19. irrigationPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
20. organicPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
21. otherPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
22. potassiumPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
23. salinityPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
24. densityPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
25. phPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
26. inoculationResults agree8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect
27. mycorrhizaResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
28. co2Results agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
29. droughtResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
30. lightResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
31. seed treatmentResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
32. soil waterResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
33. stageResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
34. transplantingResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.