Zymoseptoria tritici · Triticum aestivum (wheat)

1. mefentrifluconazolePositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
2. azoxystrobinPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
3. cyproconazolePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
4. prothioconazolePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
5. pyraclostrobinPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
6. surfactinPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
7. salicylic acidResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. Trichoderma harzianumResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. epoxiconazoleResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. Clonostachys roseaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. chlorothalonilResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. double-stranded RNAResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
13. fenpicoxamidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. ferulic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. fluxapyroxadResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
16. fungicideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
17. oxalic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
18. fungicidePositive and negative results16 papers: 13 positive, 3 negative or no effect
19. applicationPositive and negative results12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect
20. inoculationPositive and negative results10 papers: 5 positive, 5 negative or no effect
21. loss of functionPositive and negative results10 papers: 5 positive, 5 negative or no effect
22. seed treatmentPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
23. humidityPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
24. pathogen productPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
25. infectionResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
26. stageResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.