Heterodera avenae · Triticum aestivum (wheat)

1. 1,2-dibromoethanePositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
2. zinc sulfatePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
3. aldicarbResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. fluopyramResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. ammonium sulfateResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
6. carbofuranResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. imidaclopridResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. oxamylResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. inoculationPositive and negative results5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect
10. insecticidePositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
11. phosphorusPositive and negative results5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect
12. infectionPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
13. nitrogenResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. rotationResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. seed treatmentResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
16. applicationResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
17. fertilizationResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
18. loss of functionResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
19. otherResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
20. sowing timeResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
21. transplantingResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.