Gaeumannomyces tritici · Triticum aestivum (wheat)

1. Gaeumannomyces graminisPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
2. flutriafolPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
3. ammonium sulfateResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. Bacillus subtilisResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. PhialophoraResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. Pseudomonas chlororaphisResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. Pseudomonas fluorescensResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. ammonium dihydrogen phosphateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. inoculationPositive and negative results7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect
10. rotationPositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
11. fertilizationPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
12. nitrogenPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
13. fungicideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. growing mediumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. sowing timeResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
16. tillageResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.