Avena · Triticum aestivum (wheat)

1. isoproturonPositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
2. Tri-allatePositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
3. barbanPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
4. Chasmanthium latifoliumResults agree4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect
5. DifenzoquatResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. methylResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. surfactantResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. 2,4-DResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. Benzoylprop-ethylResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. FlampropResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. diclofopResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. diclofop-methylResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. herbicidePositive and negative results6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect
14. densityPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.