Sitophilus oryzae · Triticum aestivum (wheat)

1. spinosadPositive and negative results9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect
2. malathionPositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
3. Nicotiana tabacumPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
4. Murraya koenigiiPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
5. silicon dioxidePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
6. diatomaceous earthResults agree15 papers: 15 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. Syzygium aromaticumResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. deltamethrinResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. Azadirachta indicaResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. Cymbopogon citratusResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. chloroformResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. Allium sativumResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. Curcuma longaResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. Zingiber officinaleResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. abamectinResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
16. chlorpyrifos-methylResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
17. etherResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
18. Anethum graveolensResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
19. ChenopodiumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
20. Citrus reticulataResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
21. Lantana camaraResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
22. Ocimum basilicumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
23. Pinus roxburghiiResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
24. Pongamia pinnataResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
25. acetoneResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
26. aluminium oxideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
27. camphorResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
28. carvoneResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
29. fenitrothionResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
30. kaolinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
31. phenothrinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
32. pirimiphos-methylResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
33. botanicalPositive and negative results41 papers: 39 positive, 2 negative or no effect
34. storagePositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
35. insecticidePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
36. nanoparticleResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
37. growing mediumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
38. ozoneResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.