Bassia · Triticum aestivum (wheat)

1. dicambaResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
2. 2,4-DResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
3. (4-chloro-2-methylphenoxy)acetic acidResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. 3,5-dibromo-4-hydroxybenzonitrileResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. sulfentrazoneResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. herbicideResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.