Rhyzopertha dominica · Triticum aestivum (wheat)

1. diatomaceous earthPositive and negative results15 papers: 14 positive, 1 negative or no effect
2. chlorpyrifos-methylPositive and negative results7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect
3. Azadirachta indicaPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
4. pirimiphos-methylPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
5. malathionPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
6. spinosadResults agree11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. Beauveria bassianaResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. piperonyl butoxideResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. deltamethrinResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. fenitrothionResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. Curcuma longaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. Jatropha curcasResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. Linum usitatissimumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. Plodia interpunctellaResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
15. SpinetoramResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
16. abamectinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
17. bioresmethrinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
18. castor oilResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
19. botanicalPositive and negative results18 papers: 16 positive, 2 negative or no effect
20. infectionPositive and negative results5 papers: 1 positive, 4 negative or no effect
21. co2Results agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
22. nanoparticleResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
23. ozoneResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.