Pest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)

167 questions: every treatment tested on this organism for this target by at least two papers.

  1. imidaclopridResults agree14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  2. diatomaceous earthResults agree12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  3. thiamethoxamResults agree8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  4. metsulfuron methylResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  5. deltamethrinResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  6. dieldrinResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  7. jasmonic acidResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  8. Acorus calamusResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  9. carbofuranResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  10. phosphineResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  11. silicon dioxideResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  12. SorghumResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  13. SpinetoramResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  14. Tri-allateResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  15. clothianidinResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  16. copper atomResults agree3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect
  17. fipronilResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  18. gamma-hexachlorocyclohexaneResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  19. glycine betaineResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  20. indoxacarbResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  21. malateResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  22. parathionResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  23. poly(ethylene)Results agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  24. sodium nitroprussideResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  25. Allium sativumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  26. AzotobacterResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  27. Brassica napusResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  28. Citrus reticulataResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  29. Diuraphis noxiaResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  30. Lantana camaraResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  31. Oryza sativaResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  32. PseudomonasResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  33. Rhizoctonia solaniResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  34. Steinernema feltiaeResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  35. Syzygium aromaticumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  36. Trichoderma harzianumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  37. acetoneResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  38. acroleinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  39. adjuvantResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  40. aluminium phosphideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  41. azadirachtinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  42. bromomethaneResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  43. calcium(2+)Results agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  44. captanResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  45. charcoalResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  46. chlorfenvinfosResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  47. clodinafopResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  48. diazinonResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  49. dichlorvosResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  50. diflubenzuronResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.