co2 · Quality: sugar starch · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)

Results agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 claims from these papers; 1 citation between them.

Papers reporting a positive result 2

  1. Metabolic and Transcriptional Analysis of Durum Wheat Responses to Elevated CO2at Low and High Nitrate Supply · 2016

    cited by 1 paper here

  2. De Novo Transcriptome Analysis of Durum Wheat Flag Leaves Provides New Insights Into the Regulatory Response to Elevated CO2 and High Temperature · 2019

    cites 1 paper here

A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.

co2 on Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat) against other targets

co2 · quality: sugar starch on other organisms