Yield · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)

63 questions: every treatment tested on this organism for this target by at least two papers.

  1. sulfur atomResults differ6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect · 1 pair of papers confirmed to differ
  2. boron atomResults differ5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect · 2 pairs of papers confirmed to differ
  3. cadmium atomResults differ2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect · 1 pair of papers confirmed to differ
  4. zinc atomPositive and negative results14 papers: 12 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  5. Triticum aestivumPositive and negative results8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  6. Triticum turgidum subsp. durumPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  7. crown compoundPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  8. diclofop-methylPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  9. iron atomResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  10. salicylic acidResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  11. selenium atomResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  12. zinc oxideResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  13. (2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  14. 146712Results agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  15. 2,4-DResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  16. Azospirillum brasilenseResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  17. Bacillus atrophaeusResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  18. ScorpioResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  19. Vicia fabaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  20. ammonium nitrateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  21. chitosanResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  22. fertilizationResults differ79 papers: 68 positive, 11 negative or no effect · 11 pairs of papers confirmed to differ
  23. salinityResults differ12 papers: 0 positive, 12 negative or no effect · 1 pair of papers confirmed to differ
  24. nitrogenPositive and negative results56 papers: 46 positive, 10 negative or no effect
  25. tillagePositive and negative results43 papers: 31 positive, 12 negative or no effect
  26. irrigationPositive and negative results39 papers: 33 positive, 6 negative or no effect
  27. droughtPositive and negative results34 papers: 6 positive, 28 negative or no effect
  28. densityPositive and negative results23 papers: 19 positive, 4 negative or no effect
  29. applicationPositive and negative results20 papers: 17 positive, 3 negative or no effect
  30. herbicidePositive and negative results20 papers: 12 positive, 8 negative or no effect
  31. inoculationPositive and negative results19 papers: 18 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  32. rotationPositive and negative results17 papers: 13 positive, 4 negative or no effect
  33. sowing timePositive and negative results15 papers: 9 positive, 6 negative or no effect
  34. phosphorusPositive and negative results12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  35. climate sitePositive and negative results9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  36. intercroppingPositive and negative results9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  37. cultivation systemPositive and negative results8 papers: 3 positive, 5 negative or no effect
  38. heatPositive and negative results7 papers: 2 positive, 5 negative or no effect
  39. mycorrhizaPositive and negative results7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  40. rainfallPositive and negative results7 papers: 3 positive, 4 negative or no effect
  41. organicPositive and negative results6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  42. potassiumPositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  43. transgenicPositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  44. transplantingPositive and negative results5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect
  45. stagePositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  46. botanicalPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  47. co2Positive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  48. infectionPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  49. lightPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  50. loss of functionPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.