Abutilon theophrasti · Zea mays (maize)

1. atrazinePositive and negative results15 papers: 12 positive, 3 negative or no effect
2. dicambaPositive and negative results6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect
3. adjuvantPositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
4. ammonium sulfatePositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
5. tolpyralatePositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
6. glyphosateResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. isoxaflutoleResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. glufosinateResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. 2,4-DResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. Zea mays subsp. maysResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. fluthiacet-methylResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. metolachlorResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. nicosulfuronResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. pyroxasulfoneResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. topramezoneResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
16. herbicidePositive and negative results13 papers: 9 positive, 4 negative or no effect
17. botanicalPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
18. fertilizationResults agree4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect
19. applicationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
20. tillageResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.