Sorghum halepense · Zea mays (maize)

1. isoxaflutolePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
2. nicosulfuronResults agree10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect
3. PrimisulfuronResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. EPTCResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. glyphosateResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. rimsulfuronResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. imazapicResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. metolachlorResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. paraquatResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
10. herbicidePositive and negative results17 papers: 13 positive, 4 negative or no effect
11. botanicalResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. climate siteResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.