Bipolaris maydis · Zea mays (maize)

1. Allium cepaPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
2. copper atomPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
3. salicylic acidPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
4. Azadirachta indicaResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. Trichoderma virideResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. mancozebResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. Allium sativumResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. carbendazimResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. propiconazoleResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. DaturaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. EucalyptusResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. Syzygium aromaticumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. Zea mays subsp. maysResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
14. dimethyl disulfideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. loss of functionPositive and negative results9 papers: 5 positive, 4 negative or no effect
16. pathogen productPositive and negative results8 papers: 2 positive, 6 negative or no effect
17. inoculationPositive and negative results5 papers: 1 positive, 4 negative or no effect
18. botanicalResults agree8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect
19. applicationResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.