Sitophilus oryzae · Zea mays (maize)

1. Acorus calamusResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
2. Catharanthus roseusResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
3. Vitex negundoResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. Zea mays subsp. maysResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. spinosadResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. botanicalPositive and negative results13 papers: 9 positive, 4 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.