- Zea mays subsp. maysPositive and negative results17 papers: 11 positive, 6 negative or no effect
- carbarylPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- aminocarbPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- methomylResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- permethrinResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- MexacarbateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- carbofuranResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- chlorpyrifosResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- cypermethrinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- fenvalerateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- transgenicPositive and negative results22 papers: 18 positive, 4 negative or no effect
- insecticidePositive and negative results8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- applicationPositive and negative results7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- irrigationPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- infectionResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.